By Paul Goble
Members of the Saami nationality living
in northern Norway are doing far better than their co-ethnics living on the
other side of the Russian Federation border near Murmansk. Indeed, the
differences between the standard of living of the two groups represents one of
the most striking indictments of the achievement of Norway in helping this
numerically small people of the North to successfully modernize and the almost
utter failure of the Russian Federation to do the same.
The natural environment on the two
sides of the border is remarkably similar, Ilya Klishin of Moscow’s independent
Dozhd television says, and that makes the differences between the way the Saami
live in Norway and the way they do in Russia even more striking. And because
the Saami are a single nation, the elimination of that cultural factor as a
source of differences make the system differences between Norway and Russia all
that much more obvious (snob.ru, September 29).
On
the Russian side of the border, Klishin says, Murmansk, a city of 300,000,
produces “an oppressive impression.” Docks are empty, buildings are in decay,
soldiers are marching about and formerly important “industrial leviathans” are
quiet, surrounded by “depressed” Khrushchev-era slums. The oblast has 700,000
people in all, and “almost all of them live in cities where the predominant
color is the gray of concrete blocks” (snob.ru, September 29).
In
Norway’s Finmark, just over the border, there are just 70,000 people, but they
live in brightly colored houses, have cafes, boats, bars, malls and hotels even
in the smallest cities with populations of less than a thousand. Foreigners who
come there to fish often “remain to live,” something that simply does not
happen in Murmansk. The Russian city is not expecting any visitors and it does not
receive any: air tickets are absurdly expensive, and the hotels are bad and
usually empty.
Sometimes
Norwegians from further away come in to drink—alcohol is cheaper—but the Saami
and Norwegians living near the border do not. The only reason they go to Russia
is for gasoline, but they do not stay any longer than they have to, Klishin
continues. On the Norwegian side of the border, the Saami are thriving; on the
Russian side, they, like the Pomors before them, are dying out and may
disappear. The Pomors, a subgroup of Russians, numbered 260,000 in 1926; now
they amount to only 20,000 or even fewer.
All
this, the Dozhd journalist says, prompts the question: “Why can we not, even on
our own land, settle ourselves in a normal way?” Is it because of the Soviet
experiment? Or is it something in ourselves? As the collapse of the Soviet
Union recedes into the past, the second hypothesis seems increasingly likely,
he suggests. And then he makes the most
damning indictment of all: What one sees in Murmansk in comparison to Norway is
not limited to that region but involves all of the Russian Federation (snob.ru, September 29).
I live in Ukraine and had many of the same questions about how much of the Russian/Ukrainian culture is left over from soviet times and experiments in creating Soviet man and how much is bred-in-the-bone. I started reading 19th century novels and short stories by the Russian literary greats and found to my surprise that much of what I was seeing today was part of the culture 200 years ago, too. Sawki and others have concluded that the USSR had "communism with Russian characteristics"
ReplyDelete