Thursday, September 3, 2009

Will Moldova’s New Coalition Succeed?

by Tammy Lynch

On August 28, Moldova’s brand new parliament elected a brand new speaker – Liberal Party head Mihai Ghimpu. The 58-year-old Ghimpu has been the head of the Chisinau City Council since 2007.

Ghimpu’s election comes on the heels of an opposition victory in the July 29 snap parliamentary elections and the subsequent creation of a majority coalition christened the Alliance for European Integration (AEI).

The AEI favors closer relations with the European Union, particularly with regard to lessoning visa requirements for Moldovans. Both sides also understand that the ongoing issue of smuggling through the separatist republic of Transnistria must be addressed. Finally, the AEI is interested in negotiating with the IMF for assistance.

Before moving forward with EU or IMF talks, however, the AEI must prove itself domestically. This Alliance is the most recent of many; earlier versions have failed. Over the last eight years, under a succession of Communist Party governments, opposition strides were quickly eliminated by infighting, capitulation to the ruling party and political ambition.

In fact, until this year, the work of Moldova’s “democrats” generally has been disappointing. Moldova has become the poorest country in Europe with a population where 1/3 of its citizens are believed to work abroad.

But, just maybe, this year will be different.

The country’s opposition appears to have received a major shove from “the people,” who viewed 5 April parliamentary elections as fraudulent and rose up in protest. The uprisings began a series of moves that ended in the AEI. The protests also appear to have struck fear into the Communist Party for the first time, forcing fairer repeat elections.

The 29 July elections gave the “opposition” 53 of 101 seats and the right to form the government – should the four opposition parties be able to work together.

The election of Ghimpu and a series of well-coordinated statements provide glimmers of hope that the parties may be able to do just that. But, the hard work is just starting.

While the majority coalition has enough votes to name a speaker and prime minister, it will need additional votes from eight Communists to replace Communist President Vladimir Voronin. In Moldova’s parliamentary system, the president is elected by 61 votes.

To deal with this deficiency, Ghimpu announced that the coalition had agreed to nominate former Communist Speaker of Parliament Marian Lupo as president. Lupo resigned from the Party only after the April protests. However, before joining the Communists, he headed the EU’s TACIS program. In August, he claimed that Communist discipline was forced “by repressive measures and fear.”

As if to prove Lupo correct, in response to the election of the speaker, the Communist Party’s leadership insisted all members boycott parliament. This tactic undermines Lupo’s attempts to split the party.

But President Voronin understands the boycott can’t go on forever. This week, he announced his impending resignation – which will happen sometime in the future. He also pointedly threatened one of the coalition leaders: “We will find other ways to deal with you.”

So now the questions become - How far with Voronin go to keep his MPs in line? What will Lupo do to find those eight votes? And after a history of giving in, will the opposition finally hold together?


  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

  2. All opposition parties that lose an election claim fraudulent activities, even if there is none or the extent of errors in the conduct of the election would not have effected the overall result. International observers have supported the outcome of the Moldova's elections.

    Moldova like Ukraine is divided.

    Statistically in any re-run election there is a swing of 4 to 6 % to the opposition. Moldova and Ukraine is no exception.

    The main difference in the outcome of Moldova's August ballot was in the consolidation of votes and the fact that fewer voters were disenfranchised by not supporting minor candidates that fell below the 5% electoral threshold. As a result the Communist party representation was much lower in August then in April.

    Moldova like the EU elects its head of state by a vote of its Parliament, Unlike the EU Moldova requires a Constitutional majority of 60% to elect its president. Something that has been denied to Ukraine.

    Moldova would be wise to learn from the mistakes of Ukraine, where its head of State, Viktor Yushchenko, has been engaged in a destructive and divisive power struggle between of office of the president and the peoples democratically elected Parliament.

    Yushchenko, who has less then 4% public support, has undermined public confidence by illegally interfering with the independence and operation of Ukraine's constitutional Court in 2007 causing seven months of political and civil unrest in Ukraine, Yushchenko, in the process further undermined political and economic stability and Ukraine's democratic development.

    It is now incumbent on ALL political parties in Moldova to play a constructive role and to reach a consensus of agreement in deciding who will be Moldova's next head of state.


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.